New England Patriots tight end Aaron Hernandez was arrested yesterday in Massachusetts for murder. In following the case in news broadcasts and the internet, I was struck by the appearance of the detectives during the multiple searches that were done at Hernandez's residence. In the videos and photographs I saw of the detectives conducting the searches, I noticed that the majority of them were not wearing a sports jacket.
When I was a LAPD homicide detective in South Central Los Angeles, my lieutenant was a stickler for us to always wear our sports jackets any time we were at a crime scene or in the public eye. People even called homicide detectives 'the suits.' It didn't matter how hot it was, whether we were canvassing a neighborhood for witnesses, or baking at a crime scene; he made us wear those jackets. At the time some thought he was old fashioned and out of touch, but now that I look back on it, he kept up the public image of professionals at work. Even today as a private investigator, I still wear a sports jacket when doing interviews or witness canvasses. When people think of police detectives, they think jacket and tie. Anything less and it minimizes the public perception.
It was interesting to note that when Hernandez was led out of his house in handcuffs, the two detectives with him both had their jackets and ties on.
Showing posts with label Murder Investigations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Murder Investigations. Show all posts
Thursday, June 27, 2013
Monday, June 25, 2012
Informants: Working Hard or Hardly Working
When I first started out as a young police detective, I would spend hundreds of hours, often times for naught, trying to solve a heinous or complex crime. After a while, I discovered that if I spent about fifteen minutes with the right person, in the right place, and maybe throw in a cigarette and a candy bar, I could often crack the case. In investigating terms, the right person was an informant. This goes for both police detectives and private investigators. Often times there is someone out there who has knowledge of the case, but you have to use the right approach and do it in the right location, in order to get the right results.
Try not to let police movies or TV cloud your vision of how to work an informant. You don’t approach someone on the street and expect them to talk to you. By doing this, it also shows your lack of knowledge of the street and you won’t be trusted. For police detectives, an individual can be interviewed back at the police station or in the lock up.
I used to scan the daily arrest logs to see if anyone got arrested near one of the crimes I was investigating, or if any of my informants had managed to get themselves locked up. I’d talk to the detective that was handling the individual’s current arrest to clear it with him, and then I’d go and talk to him. It’s amazing how many arrestees, knowing that their looking at going back to prison, will talk to you if you have the right approach. You have to be able to convince them that you will protect them and not reveal their identity. Start small, and once they give something up that appears to be good, that’s when they get rewarded with the coffee or soda. The more they give up, and the bigger the case, is when the candy bars and cigarettes come out. Remember, they get the goodies after they cooperate, not before.
The same holds for private investigators. You can meet with a possible cooperative informant off-site from his workplace or home. Whether you’re a cop or a PI, you always pick the time and location. You want to make sure you’re not being setup.
Different motivations motivate different people to give up information. It can be fear, revenge, retaliation, power, honesty etc. You need to find which one is the one that turns your informant. Find the right one, and your case can be solved.
Friday, June 1, 2012
THE ETAN PATZ CASE
A 33 year old missing person’s case in New York City is again drawing international headlines. On May 25, 1979, six year old Etan Patz disappeared on his way to school. His photograph was the first missing child to appear on milk cartons. Although the case has been widely publicized throughout the years, no arrests were ever made. Recently, however, news reports have stated that NYPD detectives had interviewed an individual in New Jersey and he had confessed to the crime. These same reports stated that the suspect had discarded the victim’s body in a trash bag in the garbage.
From an investigative stand point, this is an extremely difficult case. First and foremost, you’re dealing with a criminal case that is 33 years old. Secondly, the victim’s remains have never been recovered. Witnesses may be difficult to locate, some of the detectives who worked on the case could be deceased, possible crime scenes may have been renovated or destroyed, case files could be misplaced, evidence could be compromised etc. The neighborhood where the crime took place could be severely altered after so much time has passed.
If the suspect has supposedly confessed to the detectives, probably the most important part of the interrogation from a prosecutorial standpoint is if the suspect told the detectives things that only the killer would know. Police detectives will always attempt to hold back from the public important details in a crime for just that reason. It’s not uncommon to have people confess to notorious crimes. It’s when you get down to specific issues that are unique to that specific crime is how detectives can weed out the sensation seekers from the real suspect.
The job facing the NYPD detectives will be going back and trying to recreate a crime scene from information obtained from the confession. They will go over everything the suspect told them to see if they can find any type of physical evidence or eyewitness accounts to match his story. They will be going over New York City Sanitation records to attempt to find out any information regarding trash pickup on the specific date and location that the suspect provided them. They’ll attempt to locate the truck driver and any sanitation workers that were on the route on that day. They’ll even go over city dump records in an attempt to locate the specific location in the dump where that specific truck off loaded its contents.
Attempting to file a criminal case against a defendant without any evidence other than a confession would be difficult at best. The tragedy begins all over again for the victim’s family, who are again thrust into the limelight because of this horrible crime.
Monday, August 8, 2011
THE NIGHT STALKER
From April 1984 through August 1985, the state of California was terrorized by a series of 13 grisly murders that would eventually become known as the Night Stalker case. Richard Ramirez was eventually arrested and convicted on the case and now sits on Death Row. Because the murders happened in both the City and County of Los Angeles, both the Los Angeles Police Department and the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department had their own separate task forces to investigate the crimes. I was one of the 11 LAPD Metropolitan Division officers who were loaned up to LAPD Robbery-Homicide Division to assist their detectives on the case. I can still vividly recall one of their senior detectives giving us our initial briefing on the case. He told us that they thought the killer was taunting the police because at one of the murder scenes he scrawled what looked to them to be a Sheriffs badge. What we didn’t know at the time, but found out as the case progressed, was that it was a pentagram, the sign of the devil. As the investigation continued, it became more apparent that the suspect was involved in devil worship. I mentioned to the lieutenant in charge of our task force that the Catholic Church has an exorcist in each of their diocese who would be very knowledgeable on that subject and maybe able to help us. He gave me the approval to contact the Los Angeles Archdiocese, and they put me in contact with a priest in one of the nearby parishes. When I contacted him by phone, I was somewhat circumspect about the real reason we wanted to talk to him. I just told him we were working on a case that might have overtones of devil worship and could he help us out. He readily agreed to talk to us, and I brought him down to the task force headquarters at the old Parker Center headquarters of the LAPD. When he walked into the task force office he saw the large computerized print out with the words’ Night Stalker Task Force’ spread out on the wall. He turned to me and said, “I thought this was what it was about.” For the next hour and a half, he spoke to us about devil worship, Satan, and the Black Mass. There were 6 veteran homicide detectives from RHD along with 11 hardened street cops from Metro in the room at the time. He had our rapt attention. When he was finished, it was so quiet you could have heard a pin drop. We all wondered what had we gotten ourselves into here. I’ll write more about this case in some of my up-coming posts.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)